Posts in Commentary
Saudi Arabia diversifies it's economy big time.
 Masayoshi Son and Mohammed bin Salman.Photographer: Jeenah Moon/Bloomberg

Masayoshi Son and Mohammed bin Salman.Photographer: Jeenah Moon/Bloomberg

Don't ever let anyone tell you there's no money in renewables, especially after this phenomenal deal. (BTW, hows it going with that financing of your silly coal mine idea in the Galilee Basin Adani?)
This story has just broken today of an incredible deal between Saudi Arabia, who seem to be trying very hard to change the colour of their spots, so to speak, and the Soft Bank Group Corporation. It's a 200 Billion dollar deal that will see Saudi build a two hundred billion dollar solar farm that will generate 200GW's of electricity for the country.  To put it in perspective, the nearest solar farm of scale is the proposed 2 GW Bulli Creek Solar Farm in Australia according to Bloomberg. This motha's gunna dwarf that by an enormous degree. 

There's some mighty money being thrown at large scale renewable energy projects around the world and the scale of them is just now beginning to get really serious. Think of the enormous wind turbines being built by General Electric where each turbine will put out 12 MW each. I think I read they're going to be installed off shore of Victoria in the coming year on a wind farm that will put out one and a half times more power than the recently closed brown coal Hazlewood power plant.

Hurricane Abbott

I read this today and had to repost it as I believe it succinctly cuts through to the core of Tony Abbott, as to the low character of the man himself and the selfishness of his political ambitions.

Force of Abbott

1538AAA5-1AEA-40DC-B954-D1B387548285.full.JPG

Periodically, a fact is so self-evident that to state it can make its obviousness seem startling. This, for example: There is no force in public life more destructive than Tony Abbott.

For almost a decade, since he first became opposition leader, Tony Abbott has held Australia to ransom. He has trashed four parliaments. None were better for his presence in them.

His solitary skill is damage. He has wrecked institutions, torn down careers. He has ridiculed the rule of law and coarsened the realm of debate. He has governed against minorities and indulged himself at the expense of duty.

In opposition, he was driven by entitlement, by a loon-eyed belief that he had been anointed to higher office. Here was a man whose mother believed he would be pope or prime minister. Ill discipline denied him the former and cost him the latter.

Having lost the leadership, Abbott is driven by revenge. He has no interest but himself. His anger is the anger of confusion. Abbott cannot reconcile that the world is not the way he imagined it to be, with him as prime minister and the country docile in its satisfaction. This confusion is greater than simple self-interest: it is driven by the fact Abbott never understood he was living in a contemporary society; he governed for a world that no longer existed, for a fantasy of the past. His leadership was always illusory. His default has always been treachery.

That one man could do so much damage is testament to his corrosive gift for harm. Here is the man who held back the country on climate action, who invented whole electoral edifices to deny marriage equality. Here is the man who weaponised a fear of refugees and later Muslims, who made citizenship a plaything, who fractured the community in the hope of leading its broken wreckage. Here is a man for whom truth is an abstract concept. The most honest thing to be said about him is that he has a working substitute for integrity.

A person of any dignity would resign the parliament. There is no room for him in it and he has nothing to offer if he stays. Each day he remains, he serves only as a lesson in the flaws of the human character. He is a study in male rage.

A byelection is always a fraught proposition, especially for a government in a state such as that which Malcolm Turnbull leads. There is always a risk that an independent might win and refuse the balance of power.

But the risk posed by electors is no match for the risk posed by Tony Abbott. This man is dangerous. He has nothing to lose, not dignity nor esteem. He stands for nothing and that makes him explosive.

The parliament cannot continue in this stalemate. The Liberal Party cannot continue to negotiate with a terrorist. That is what Tony Abbott has become. He has no care for the carnage he creates. He is not troubled by the damage, by the policy stasis, by the landmines he sets between what the country wants and what its leader is allowed to do.

Tony Abbott has never provided good government. He has spent almost a decade denying it. The only decent thing he has left to contribute is his resignation.

This article was first published in the print edition of The Saturday Paper on Jul 8, 2017 as "Force of Abbott". Subscribe here.